|
QUESTIONS THAT SHOULD BE ASKED
The following message was authored by Congressman
Ron Paul of Texas. Notice his comments and
questions about a possible (and unfortunately
likely) war with Iraq. War is about the most
serious committment that you can make in life.
It means that you are willing to die for the
reason you are fighting. Is there any evidence
that Iraq even poses a threat to us? I have one
question to anyone who supports this possible war
and it is simple: what would you be willing to
sacrifice to obtain the objective to overthrow
the current government of Iraq? Are you willing
to die, be injured, pay higher taxes or anything
else? I can answer for me. I oppose this war
for the reasons stated below and I am willing to
sacrifice nothing to support this war. A decade
ago, America went to war against the same man and
he has outlasted two American Presidents who have
made him a foreign policy priority. Is the
current President attempting to get revenge for
his father? The summary of all the questions
below is show us the evidence. Not even the UN
appears to support this war and they are the ones
who origianlly authorized war against Iraq a
decade ago.
How about this as a foreign policy slogan for
America, "America first." The United States of
America was founded on personal liberty and
responsibility not international
interventionalism. I wish that more people would
remember President George Washignton's farewell
address when he reminded America to stay free of
all foreign alliances. Questions That Won't Be Asked About Iraq
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
In the House of Representatives, September 10, 2002
Soon we hope to have hearings on the pending war with Iraq. I am
concerned there are some questions that won't be asked -
and maybe will not even be allowed to be asked. Here are some questions
I would like answered by those who are urging us
to start this war.
1. Is it not true that the reason we did not bomb the Soviet Union at
the height of the Cold War was because we knew they
could retaliate?
2. Is it not also true that we are willing to bomb Iraq now because we
know it cannot retaliate -- which just confirms that there
is no real threat?
3. Is it not true that those who argue that even with inspections we
cannot be sure that Hussein might be hiding weapons, at the
same time imply that we can be more sure that weapons exist in the
absence of inspections?
4. Is it not true that the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency was
able to complete its yearly verification mission to Iraq
just this year with Iraqi cooperation?
5. Is it not true that the intelligence community has been unable to
develop a case tying Iraq to global terrorism at all, much less
the attacks on the United States last year? Does anyone remember that 15
of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and
that none came from Iraq?
6. Was former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vincent Cannistraro wrong when
he recently said there is no confirmed evidence of
Iraq's links to terrorism?
7. Is it not true that the CIA has concluded there is no evidence that a
Prague meeting between 9/11 hijacker Atta and Iraqi
intelligence took place?
8. Is it not true that northern Iraq, where the administration claimed
al-Qaeda were hiding out, is in the control of our "allies,"
the Kurds?
9. Is it not true that the vast majority of al-Qaeda leaders who escaped
appear to have safely made their way to Pakistan,
another of our so-called allies?
10. Has anyone noticed that Afghanistan is rapidly sinking into total
chaos, with bombings and assassinations becoming daily
occurrences; and that according to a recent UN report the al-Qaeda "is,
by all accounts, alive and well and poised to strike
again, how, when, and where it chooses"?
11. Why are we taking precious military and intelligence resources away
from tracking down those who did attack the United
States -- and who may again attack the United States -- and using them to
invade countries that have not attacked the United
States?
12. Would an attack on Iraq not just confirm the Arab world's worst
suspicions about the US - and isn't this what bin Laden
wanted?
13. How can Hussein be compared to Hitler when he has no navy or air
force, and now has an army 1/5 the size of twelve
years ago, which even then proved totally inept at defending the
country?
14. Is it not true that the constitutional power to declare war is
exclusively that of the Congress? Should presidents, contrary to
the Constitution, allow Congress to concur only when pressured by public
opinion? Are presidents permitted to rely on the UN
for permission to go to war?
15. Are you aware of a Pentagon report studying charges that thousands
of Kurds in one village were gassed by the Iraqis,
which found no conclusive evidence that Iraq was responsible, that Iran
occupied the very city involved, and that evidence
indicated the type of gas used was more likely controlled by Iran not
Iraq?
16. Is it not true that anywhere between 100,000 and 300,000 US soldiers
have suffered from Persian Gulf War syndrome
from the first Gulf War, and that thousands may have died?
17. Are we prepared for possibly thousands of American casualties in a
war against a country that does not have the capacity
to attack the United States?
18. Are we willing to bear the economic burden of a $100 billion war
against Iraq, with oil prices expected to skyrocket and
further rattle an already shaky American economy? How about an estimated
30 years occupation of Iraq that some have
deemed necessary to "build democracy" there?
19. Iraq's alleged violations of UN resolutions are given as reason to
initiate an attack, yet is it not true that hundreds of UN
Resolutions have been ignored by various countries without penalty?
20. Did former President Bush not cite the UN Resolution of 1990 as the
reason he could not march into Baghdad, while
supporters of a new attack assert that it is the very reason we can
march into Baghdad?
21. Is it not true that, contrary to current claims, the no-fly zones
were set up by Britain and the United States without specific
approval from the United Nations?
22. If we claim membership in the international community and conform to
its rules only when it pleases us, does this not serve
to undermine our position, directing animosity toward us by both friend
and foe?
23. How can our declared goal of bringing democracy to Iraq be
believable when we prop up dictators throughout the Middle
East and support military tyrants like Musharraf in Pakistan, who
overthrew a democratically-elected president?
24. Are you familiar with the 1994 Senate Hearings that revealed the
U.S. knowingly supplied chemical and biological materials
to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war and as late as 1992 -- including after
the alleged Iraqi gas attack on a Kurdish village?
25. Did we not assist Saddam Hussein's rise to power by supporting and
encouraging his invasion of Iran? Is it honest to
criticize Saddam now for his invasion of Iran, which at the time we
actively supported?
26. Is it not true that preventive war is synonymous with an act of
aggression, and has never been considered a moral or
legitimate US policy?
27. Why do the oil company executives strongly support this war if oil
is not the real reason we plan to take over Iraq?
28. Why is it that those who never wore a uniform and are confident that
they won't have to personally fight this war are more
anxious for this war than our generals?
29. What is the moral argument for attacking a nation that has not
initiated aggression against us, and could not if it wanted?
30. Where does the Constitution grant us permission to wage war for any
reason other than self-defense?
31. Is it not true that a war against Iraq rejects the sentiments of the
time-honored Treaty of Westphalia, nearly 400 years ago,
that countries should never go into another for the purpose of regime
change?
32. Is it not true that the more civilized a society is, the less likely
disagreements will be settled by war?
33. Is it not true that since World War II Congress has not declared war
and -- not coincidentally -- we have not since then had
a clear-cut victory?
34. Is it not true that Pakistan, especially through its intelligence
services, was an active supporter and key organizer of the
Taliban?
35. Why don't those who want war bring a formal declaration of war
resolution to the floor of Congress?
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
Ron Paul Archives
|